Five checks, in order. Before October 10 they help identify dependencies and reduce the risk of a break, and after it they help find one. The first two take minutes in PowerShell and the admin center.
1. Read your two settings and write them down
Run the two commands above and save the output with the date. That gives you your current row of the table and a dated record of what the tenant allowed and when. Your change records add the history: who wrote the list, and when.
2. Compare the usage report with the allow list
Export the EWS usage report for the last 90 days. An application that appears in the report and on the allow list keeps EWS access while EWSEnabled is True. An application that appears in the report and is missing from the list loses access once the October 10 requirement reaches your tenant, or once Microsoft switches EWS off in a tenant that never set it. Then look for applications whose last activity date stopped moving. Investigate each one against its expected run schedule and the report's reporting delay, then check the job's own logs.
A 90-day report is a list of what called recently, so build the job calendar beside it: the scheduled jobs inside each archiving, backup, retention and eDiscovery product, your application inventory, and a confirmation from each workflow owner. Keep three lists apart: dependencies the report shows, dependencies you found another way, and open items still waiting on an owner or a vendor.
3. Check what each archive job collected
For each archive, retention, backup and eDiscovery job, compare what the last run collected with what a normal run collects: item counts, export sizes, mailboxes processed. A job that authenticates, runs and records success while reaching less of the archive looks healthy on a status dashboard. Whether a given product fails loudly or quietly depends on that product, which makes this a test to run on each one.
4. Separate an allow list block from a sign-in failure
Microsoft's field guide names the mistake it sees most often in this step: “Treating an OAuth, permission, consent, or credential failure as proof that EWSAllowedAppIDs blocked the request.” Rule those causes out first. The same guide gives a controlled before-and-after test for proving the allow list behaves as expected for one application, run in a test tenant where you can, with at least 24 hours after each change.
5. Put four questions to each vendor in writing
For anything you did not write, the answer has to come from the vendor. Four questions cover it. Does your product use Exchange Web Services today? Does it reach archive mailboxes or Discovery Mailboxes? What is your supported replacement for EWS, and on what date is it available to us? And if that replacement uses Microsoft Graph, does it handle the archive redirects Microsoft documents?
The last question earns its place. Microsoft documents that an auto-expanding archive can spread across a main archive and auxiliary archive mailboxes, that Graph can answer a request with an HTTP 308 redirect or an ErrorArchiveFolderMovedPermanently error pointing to where the content lives, and that “Well-known folder names aren't supported for archive mailboxes,” so archive folders are referenced by folder ID.
Microsoft Learn, Handle archive mailbox redirects. Retrieved October 3, 2026.
Microsoft's own applications count too. Microsoft lists Outlook for Windows, classic Outlook for Mac, Excel Power Query, Power BI and Exchange Server hybrid scenarios among the sources of EWS traffic, and says these applications still need to be added to the allow list to keep working if they show up in the usage report. For Outlook for Windows it asks customers to be on the August 2026 build 16.0.20430.20092 or later, and it says new Outlook for Mac is unaffected.
Microsoft 365 Message Center notice MC1485116; Microsoft Exchange Team Blog, October 1, 2026.