7 min read
Why Generic MSPs Fail Financial Services Compliance
In this article: The Problem With Generic MSPs Five Ways Generic MSPs Fail Financial Services Clients The Real Cost of the Wrong Provider What...
9 min read
Justin Kirsch : Updated on February 24, 2026
In this article:
Community banks face a cybersecurity problem that larger institutions solve with headcount. JPMorgan spends $15 billion a year on technology. Your bank has maybe two IT staff managing everything from teller workstations to core banking integrations to the next FFIEC cybersecurity assessment.
That gap is where managed IT services for community banks become a competitive advantage, not just a cost center. Community bank cybersecurity requires a provider who understands both the threat landscape and the regulatory response. The right provider gives a 200-person bank the same security infrastructure and compliance posture that a regional bank with a 30-person IT department maintains. The wrong provider gives you antivirus and a help desk.
This guide covers what community banks should look for in a managed IT provider, which regulatory requirements your provider must understand, and how to tell the difference between a generic managed service provider (MSP) and one that actually knows banking.
Note: While this article focuses on community banks, credit unions face nearly identical requirements under the NCUA, and mortgage companies have parallel obligations under the FTC Safeguards Rule. The evaluation criteria below apply to any financial institution choosing a managed IT provider.
Banking IT isn't office IT. Your environment has regulatory, data, and operational requirements that most managed service providers have never dealt with:
A provider that doesn't understand banking operations will either lock your environment down so tightly that tellers can't process transactions, or leave it open enough that your next OCC exam becomes a problem.
Community banks operate under overlapping federal and state regulatory frameworks. Your managed IT provider needs to understand all of them, not just the one they Googled before the sales call.
The FFIEC CAT is the benchmark your examiners use. It maps your inherent risk profile (based on your products, services, and technology) against five cybersecurity maturity domains: cyber risk management, threat intelligence, cybersecurity controls, external dependency management, and cyber incident management.
Your IT provider should know which domain your bank is weakest in and have a specific plan to move you from "baseline" to "evolving" or "intermediate" maturity. If they've never seen the CAT, they aren't qualified to manage a bank's IT.
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act requires financial institutions to protect customer information through administrative, technical, and physical safeguards. The FTC's updated Safeguards Rule (effective June 2023) added specific requirements that directly affect your IT environment:
Your IT provider should be able to show you exactly how your Microsoft 365 environment, your endpoints, and your network satisfy each of these requirements. If they can't produce that evidence, you can't produce it for your examiner.
For OCC-supervised banks, the heightened standards go beyond GLBA. OCC examiners evaluate your third-party risk management program, which means your managed IT provider is itself subject to examination scrutiny. They'll ask about your provider's SOC 2 attestation, their business continuity plans, their own security controls, and whether you've performed due diligence on them as a vendor.
If your IT provider doesn't have a SOC 2 Type II report, you have a gap in your vendor risk management program that your examiner will find.
Not every MSP is built for banking. Here's what separates managed IT services for community banks from generic business IT support.
Most community banks run on Microsoft 365. Your provider should configure and manage:
Antivirus is table stakes. For a community bank, endpoint security means:
This isn't a marketing badge. It's a requirement for your vendor risk management program. A SOC 2 Type II report means an independent auditor has verified that your IT provider's security controls work as described over a sustained period (typically 6 to 12 months). SOC 2 Type I only confirms controls exist at a point in time. Type II confirms they actually work.
Ask for the full report, not a summary. Read the exceptions section. If there are material exceptions, ask what they've done to remediate.
When a community bank experiences a security incident, the response has regulatory dimensions that don't exist in other industries. Your provider should maintain a documented incident response plan that covers:
If your IT provider's incident response plan is a generic template that says "notify affected parties," it wasn't written for a bank.
Community banks rely heavily on third-party technology providers. Your managed IT provider should help you assess and document the security posture of your critical vendors, not just manage your internal infrastructure. This means helping you collect and evaluate SOC 2 reports from your core processor, your online banking provider, your wire transfer vendor, and your document imaging system.
These aren't minor concerns. Any one of these should make you question whether a provider is ready for banking:
ABT has managed IT environments for thousands of financial institutions — including banks, credit unions, and mortgage companies — since 1999, and currently supports over 750 active clients. Here's what that looks like in practice for community banks:
Managed IT services for community banks include Microsoft 365 administration and security, endpoint protection with EDR monitoring, network security management, FFIEC cybersecurity assessment preparation, GLBA compliance support, core banking integration management, help desk support, and incident response planning. A qualified provider also handles vendor risk management support and produces the compliance documentation that banking examiners require.
Managed IT services for community banks typically cost more than generic business IT support because banking-specific security requirements, compliance documentation, and regulatory exam preparation require specialized expertise. Pricing varies based on user count, core banking integration complexity, and the scope of compliance support included.
The FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool measures a financial institution's inherent cybersecurity risk against its cybersecurity maturity across five domains. Your IT management directly affects maturity scores because most assessed controls are IT controls, including access management, network security, endpoint protection, and incident response. A provider experienced with the FFIEC CAT identifies gaps and builds remediation plans before your examination.
Community banks should choose a managed IT provider with specific banking experience over a local generalist. Local providers rarely have FFIEC compliance, core banking integration, or banking incident response experience. A specialized provider holds SOC 2 Type II certification, produces compliance documentation examiners expect, and understands core system integrations that generalists haven't touched.
A managed IT provider for community banks should hold SOC 2 Type II attestation at minimum, verifying their security controls work over a sustained period. Additional qualifications include FFIEC cybersecurity assessment experience, GLBA Safeguards Rule knowledge, OCC examination familiarity, and Microsoft partnership credentials like Tier 1 Cloud Solution Provider status.
Community banks should configure Conditional Access policies that enforce multi-factor authentication for all users, block legacy authentication protocols, require device compliance for core banking access, and restrict sign-ins from unmanaged devices. Data Loss Prevention (DLP) rules should detect and block sharing of customer Social Security numbers, account numbers, and loan data outside the organization. Additional configurations include DMARC email authentication to prevent domain spoofing, sensitivity labels for document classification, and audit logging sufficient to produce evidence packages for OCC and FFIEC examiners.
The following tables provide definitions for regulatory frameworks and technical terms used in this article.
| Term | Full Name | What It Means |
|---|---|---|
| FFIEC | Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council | Interagency body that publishes the IT Examination Handbook and Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) used by bank examiners. |
| GLBA | Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act | Federal law requiring financial institutions to protect customer information through administrative, technical, and physical safeguards. |
| OCC | Office of the Comptroller of the Currency | Federal regulator for national banks. Conducts IT examinations using FFIEC framework. |
| NCUA | National Credit Union Administration | Federal regulator for credit unions. Uses the same FFIEC examination framework as OCC. |
| FTC Safeguards Rule | Federal Trade Commission Safeguards Rule | Requires mortgage companies and non-bank financial institutions to maintain comprehensive information security programs. |
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| BSA/AML | Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering — regulations requiring financial institutions to detect and report suspicious transactions. |
| Conditional Access | Microsoft 365 login policies that control who can access what, from which devices, and under what conditions. |
| DLP | Data Loss Prevention — rules that detect and block sensitive data from leaving the organization. |
| DMARC | Email authentication protocol that prevents attackers from sending emails that appear to come from your domain. |
| EDR | Endpoint Detection and Response — security software that monitors devices for threats and enables rapid response to incidents. |
| MSP | Managed Service Provider — a company that remotely manages a customer's IT infrastructure and systems. |
| SAR | Suspicious Activity Report — a filing required when a financial institution detects potential fraud or money laundering. |
| SOC 2 Type II | Independent audit that verifies a vendor's security controls work as described over a sustained period (typically 6-12 months). |
If your community bank is evaluating managed IT providers or preparing for your next FFIEC cybersecurity assessment, start with a clear picture of where your environment stands today.
7 min read
In this article: The Problem With Generic MSPs Five Ways Generic MSPs Fail Financial Services Clients The Real Cost of the Wrong Provider What...
Most managed IT providers sell the same pitch: "We'll handle your technology so you can focus on your business." That's fine for a retail chain. It...
1 min read
The Challenge: Manual Re-Entry and Post-Closing Inefficiencies In the mortgage department at First Citizens Bank, closing a loan used to trigger a...